Praetor 600 vs G280: how the two fleets are really flown
On all four chapters' lead measures, the gap inside each fleet is bigger than the gap between the Praetor 600 and the G280. On flights a month, the middle half of Praetor 600s runs 5–13 and of G280s 6–13; the medians are 7 and 9.
Embraer Praetor 600 fleet statistics →Gulfstream G280 fleet statistics →
Fatigue
On hours per landing, the two fleets' medians match, at 1.6 : 1.
What each landing and pressurization cycle costs the structure: landings per hour and short hops.
Hours per landing
Where the two fleets sitSide by side
Every active aircraft of each type in North America: 116 Praetor 600s and 243 G280s.| Measure | Praetor 600 median | Middle half | G280 median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hours per landing Each aircraft’s average flight hours per landing | 1.6 : 1 | 1.4–1.9 : 1 | 1.6 : 1 | 1.3–1.8 : 1 |
| Short hops Share of legs under 300 nm | 35% | 28–45% | 34% | 24–44% |
| Leg length Median leg | 472 nm | 361–641 nm | 489 nm | 352–629 nm |
Corrosion
On salt air, the two fleets' medians match, at 1%.
What the air around the fleet does overnight: salt, damp and freeze–thaw.
Salt air
Where the two fleets sitSide by side
Aircraft we can place on enough nights at known fields: 77 Praetor 600s and 171 G280s.| Measure | Praetor 600 median | Middle half | G280 median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt air Nights within 2 km of the coast | 1% | 0–5% | 1% | 0–3% |
| Near the coast Nights within 10 km of the coast | 13% | 5–39% | 8% | 3–27% |
| Damp air Hours a day at 80% humidity or more, above freezing | 6.9 h | 4.8–8.8 h | 6.8 h | 5.3–8.2 h |
| Freeze–thaw Nights that froze and thawed within the day | 7% | 2–13% | 8% | 3–17% |
| Moisture in the air Average absolute humidity overnight | 9.6 g/m³ | 7.5–11.1 g/m³ | 9.2 g/m³ | 7.7–10.9 g/m³ |
Engines and brakes
On short runways, the two fleets' medians match, at 13%.
What departures ask of engines, brakes and tires: heat and height, and runway length.
Short runways
Where the two fleets sitSide by side
Departures we could assess: 116 Praetor 600s and 243 G280s.| Measure | Praetor 600 median | Middle half | G280 median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short runways Departures where the longest runway was under 1.25× the takeoff distance | 13% | 9–20% | 13% | 8–21% |
| Hot, high takeoffs Departures at 5,000 ft density altitude or more | 5% | 2–10% | 3% | 1–8% |
| Density altitude Typical density altitude at takeoff | 1,591 ft | 1,303–2,053 ft | 1,440 ft | 1,111–1,846 ft |
Utilization
On flights a month, the gap between the types is smaller than the spread inside either fleet: the middle G280 at 9, the middle Praetor 600 at 7.
How steadily each fleet is used: flights, flying days and estimated hours.
Flights a month
Where the two fleets sitSide by side
Every active Praetor 600 (116) and G280s with at least 40% of their flights tracked (175). Each type uses the tracking rule its own fleet page uses.| Measure | Praetor 600 median | Middle half | G280 median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flights a month In the months it flew | 6.7 | 4.8–13.4 | 8.8 | 5.9–13.3 |
| Days flown a month Days with at least one flight | 5.0 | 3.6–8.0 | 6.0 | 4.3–7.7 |
| Estimated hours a year From time in the air | ≈146 h | 98–230 h | ≈171 h | 113–248 h |
Choosing between a Praetor 600 and a G280?
Check both tails, not the types.
Enter the two tails on your shortlist. TailCheck grades each one on Fatigue, Corrosion, Engines and brakes, and Utilization against its own type, then puts them side by side.
Trip-length mix
39% of Praetor 600 legs and 36% of G280 legs were under 300 nm, a gap of 3 percentage points; 23% and 22% were over 900 nm.
| Leg length (nm) | Praetor 600 | G280 |
|---|---|---|
| <150 | 17% | 16% |
| 150–300 | 22% | 20% |
| 300–450 | 13% | 12% |
| 450–600 | 9% | 12% |
| 600–900 | 16% | 17% |
| 900–1,200 | 11% | 9% |
| 1,200–1,800 | 8% | 9% |
| 1,800+ | 4% | 4% |
Share of legs by length in nautical miles, 1 Aug 2025 – 31 Jul 2026: 14,330 legs by 116 Praetor 600s and 23,659 legs by 243 G280s, every leg with a known distance. The Praetor 600's trips bunch at 150–300 nm, the G280's at 150–300 nm.
Praetor 600 vs G280: on paper
Certified figures come from each type certificate data sheet, the rest from the manufacturer. Each figure names its source; a range covers the variants one page tracks together; a dash means we don’t have a source for that figure yet. We don’t have a manufacturer source for the Praetor 600 yet, so its manufacturer rows show a dash.
| Measure | Praetor 600 | G280 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (manufacturer) | —Not in our sources yet | 3,600 nmManufacturer (spec page, Web page, captured 19 Jan 2026) |
| High-speed cruise (manufacturer) | —Not in our sources yet | Mach 0.84Manufacturer (spec page, Web page, captured 19 Jan 2026) |
| Takeoff distance (manufacturer) | —Not in our sources yet | 4,750 ftManufacturer (spec page, Web page, captured 19 Jan 2026) |
| Cabin length (manufacturer) | —Not in our sources yet | 25 ft 10 inManufacturer (spec page, Web page, captured 19 Jan 2026) |
| Maximum takeoff weight (certified) | ≈ 42,860 lbEASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.526 Issue 12, p.10; pounds converted from the kilograms stated, approximate | 39,600 lbEASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.348 Issue 6, p.10 |
| Fuel capacity (certified) | ≈ 16,140 lbEASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.526 Issue 12, p.10; pounds converted from the kilograms stated, approximate | 14,620 lbEASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.348 Issue 6, p.9 |
| Maximum operating altitude (certified) | —Not in our sources yet | 45,000 ftEASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.348 Issue 6, p.9 |
| Passenger seats (certified) | Up to 12EASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.526 Issue 12, p.11 | Up to 19EASA TCDS EASA.IM.A.348 Issue 6, p.10 |
Praetor 600 vs G280: questions
Which is flown more, the Praetor 600 or the G280?
The G280, by about 25 estimated hours a year: the middle G280 flew ≈171 h a year, the middle Praetor 600 ≈146 h. That is a fleet median: the middle half of G280s logged 113–248 h and of Praetor 600s 98–230 h, so one aircraft can sit far from its type. In flights, the medians are 7 a month for the Praetor 600 and 9 for the G280.
Which lands more often for its hours, the Praetor 600 or the G280?
About the same: the middle aircraft of both types flies 1.6 hours per landing. More landings per hour means more pressurization cycles for the same time in the air. Short hops, legs under 300 nm, make up 35% of the middle Praetor 600's legs and 34% of the middle G280's.
Which flies longer trips, the Praetor 600 or the G280?
The G280, by 17 nm on the median leg: 489 nm for the middle aircraft, against 472 nm for the Praetor 600. 39% of Praetor 600 legs and 36% of G280 legs were under 300 nm, a gap of 3 percentage points; 23% and 22% were over 900 nm.
Which spends more nights by the sea, the Praetor 600 or the G280?
About the same: the middle aircraft of both types spends 1% of its nights within 2 km of the coast. Salt air is one of the corrosion inputs a TailCheck report grades for one aircraft against its own type.
Cite this data
The Aircraft Ledger. “Embraer Praetor 600 vs Gulfstream G280.” Data to 31 July 2026. theaircraftledger.com/compare/embraer-praetor-600-vs-gulfstream-g280
Method: Praetor 600s and G280s with most departures in North America, ADS-B tracking. Flight measures cover 1 Aug 2025 – 31 Jul 2026; each figure is the median of its own fleet, with the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Estimated hours from time in the air. We assume the longest runway at each field, so short-runway figures are conservative. Specifications from type certificate data sheets and the manufacturers, each cited. About our data